How to Choose the Best App to Stay Active on GLP-1s

By George Green · February 27, 2026 · 7 min read

Woman in her 40s scrolling through a fitness app on her phone at home, in comfortable athleisure wear.

You already know you should be exercising on your GLP-1. You've probably read about the muscle-loss risk, the long-term maintenance data, the protein targets. You get it. The science isn't the problem.

The problem is finding an app that actually works for your situation.

Most fitness apps were built for a different kind of person. Someone with predictable energy. Someone who can commit to a schedule. Someone who isn't dealing with nausea every fourth week when the dose goes up, or fatigue that appears without warning, or a body that's changing so fast it's hard to know what "normal" feels like anymore.

Picking the wrong app doesn't just waste your time. Research published in the British Journal of Health Psychology in 2025 found that popular fitness apps often leave users feeling shame, guilt, and demotivation. "The exact opposite of what these tools are supposed to do," as the researchers put it. For GLP-1 users, whose energy and capacity are already fluctuating, those design failures hit harder.

Here's what to actually look for.


Look for effort-based tracking, not just step counts

Most fitness apps measure absolute output: steps taken, calories burned, kilometres covered. That works fine when your body is consistent. On GLP-1s, it doesn't.

The week after a dose increase can look completely different from the week before it. You might have managed 8,000 steps easily in week two. In week five, with nausea and fatigue from your next dose step-up, 3,000 steps might represent equal or greater effort.

An app that only reads the raw number will tell you week five was a failure. An app that understands effort, that measures your output relative to your personal baseline rather than against some fixed target, will tell you a different story.

Effort-based tracking also matters for the kinds of activity that GLP-1 users tend to do. You might not be running. You're probably doing shorter walks, some bodyweight strength work at home, maybe a yoga session when the nausea is bad. A tracker that only rewards steps or distance misses half of what you're actually doing.

Look for apps that count all movement types: walking, strength training, yoga, swimming, cycling. Everything should contribute to your weekly total. If the app has a hierarchy where "real" workouts count and everything else is a consolation prize, it's not the right fit.


Adaptive goals matter more than any other feature

A fixed daily goal sounds reasonable until you have a bad week. Then it becomes a source of guilt.

Here's what typically happens with apps that use static targets: you set an ambitious goal during signup, you hit it for two or three weeks, then a dose escalation arrives and your energy craters. You miss the target for a few days. The app shows you a broken streak, a red bar, a falling graph. You feel like you've failed. You open the app less. Within a few weeks, you've disengaged entirely.

This isn't a willpower problem. It's an app design problem.

What you need instead is a goal that recalibrates based on what you're actually doing. Not a target that resets to zero when you miss it, but one that looks at your activity over weeks and stays in a realistic range: challenging enough to push you, but achievable enough that a rough few days don't ruin your momentum.

The Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare review on GLP-1s and exercise (2025) specifically called out the need for individualised, progressively adjusted exercise prescriptions. Rigid programs, the authors noted, are particularly poorly suited to people managing the variable side effects of GLP-1 treatment. The same logic applies to app goal-setting.

Adaptive goals also matter for the upside. GLP-1 users often go through periods of noticeably increased activity as they lose weight, feel better, and build the exercise habit. An app that ratchets goals up slowly as your baseline improves, rather than leaving you at a number you set months ago, keeps things appropriately challenging.


Motivation has to come from somewhere other than guilt

Streak counters are everywhere. They work for a while. Then they become a source of anxiety, and eventually something to avoid.

The UCL and Loughborough University research analysed nearly 59,000 social media posts about popular fitness apps and found a consistent pattern: notifications, streak mechanics, and calorie targets led users to feel "pestered or guilty," with some disengaging completely. Dr Paulina Bondaronek, one of the study's authors, described "a lot of blame and shame, with people feeling they were not doing as well as they should be."

That study wasn't looking specifically at GLP-1 users. But the dynamic is worse in that context. When your capacity to exercise is genuinely constrained by nausea, dose adjustments, and a body running on reduced fuel, guilt-based motivation doesn't just fail to help. It actively discourages you from showing up on the days when you can.

The research on what actually sustains exercise over the long term points in a different direction: enjoyment, social connection, and a sense of genuine progress. A meta-analysis on exercise adherence found that partnered or group exercise leads to significantly better long-term results than solo exercise with external pressure. Accountability that comes from people who are cheering you on is qualitatively different from accountability that comes from an app telling you that you've failed.

Gamification, done well, works the same way. Not leaderboards where you're competing against athletes. Not daily challenges calibrated for someone with twice your current capacity. Small rewards, weekly variety, and a sense that showing up today moved something forward. That kind of design keeps people engaged across the messy middle of a long treatment period.


The community angle is underrated

One thing most fitness apps don't address: you're probably not training alongside people in the same situation.

General fitness communities skew toward people who are already fit, already consistent, and motivated by performance. That's fine for them. For someone navigating their fourth dose escalation while trying to maintain a walking habit, it's alienating.

What tends to work better is finding people who understand the specific texture of what you're dealing with: the fluctuating energy, the weeks where even a short walk takes real effort, the combination of pride at the progress and frustration at the limitations. That kind of peer accountability doesn't just make exercise more enjoyable. It normalises the experience, which reduces the shame spiral that can follow a bad week.

Look for apps where the community is explicitly inclusive, where a 500-step day gets the same response as a 10,000-step day, and where people are competing against their own personal baselines rather than each other's raw output.


What to avoid

A few specific design patterns that are especially problematic for GLP-1 users:

Daily streaks that punish rest. Dose escalations happen every four weeks. Each step-up brings a fresh window of potential side effects. An app that breaks your streak the first time nausea keeps you in bed is setting you up to fail repeatedly, through no fault of your own.

Calorie-focused tracking. You're already eating in a significant deficit on GLP-1 medication. That's the point. You don't need an app reinforcing food anxiety on top of that. The UCL study found calorie logging was one of the most consistent sources of shame and guilt across users. For GLP-1 users already dealing with reduced appetite, food obsession is the last thing you need.

Apps designed for athletes or advanced exercisers. High entry barriers kill motivation before it starts. If the app's default workouts assume 45 minutes free and a gym membership, most GLP-1 users will feel behind before they've even started.

Rigid weekly workout plans. A fixed schedule like "Monday: upper body, Tuesday: cardio, Wednesday: lower body" sounds sensible until week five of treatment. You need flexibility, not a plan that assumes every week looks the same.

Notifications framed as warnings. "You haven't logged your workout yet!" is not the same as "Great job on yesterday's walk!" The framing of reminders matters more than most people realise, and research consistently shows that warning-framed prompts backfire, especially for people who are already self-critical about their exercise habits.


How Motion fits this

Motion was designed around exactly the problems above, which is why it tends to work well for GLP-1 users.

Adaptive goals are the core mechanic. Motion analyses your activity over a rolling 12-week window and keeps your weekly target in a range that's achievable but not trivial. If a dose escalation wrecks a week, your baseline adjusts. You're not penalised for it, and you don't come back to an impossible target when you feel better.

The effort-based scoring means every activity type counts: walking, strength sessions, yoga, swimming. Everything contributes to your weekly goal. And when you challenge friends through Activity Battles, you're competing on effort percentage, not absolute step counts or calories burned. A friend who's training for a 5K and you walking 20 minutes a day are on equal footing.

The Motmot companions add a motivational layer that works nothing like streaks or leaderboards. Your Motmot responds positively when you move, regardless of how much. There's no failure state. Missing a day doesn't trigger a guilt response. It's a gentle, low-pressure nudge that tends to work even on the days when harder motivation falls flat.

And Motion's community skews toward people building exercise habits from a low base, including many users navigating health changes, recovery, and the kind of inconsistent energy that comes with medical treatment. It's not a performance community. It's a support one.


Start where you are

Choosing the right app is one decision. Using it consistently across a year of GLP-1 treatment is another thing entirely.

The apps that work for GLP-1 users aren't necessarily the most feature-rich or the most popular. They're the ones that meet you where you actually are, on the good weeks and the rough ones, without making you feel like you're failing every time your body doesn't cooperate.

That's the bar. It's not a high one. But a lot of apps don't clear it.

Try Motion free →

Frequently asked questions

If you have anything else you want to ask, reach out to us.

Motion app icon

Your Fitness Journey Starts Here

Download Motion free and discover why this is the fitness app you'll actually keep using. Your future self (and your Motmot) will thank you.

App StorePlay Store